If you're horny and single or even looking for a bit extra while you're in a relationship, using a male sex toy for masturbation is a lot better than the tired 'five finger shuffle' and getting your hands messy.If you've never thought about buying a sex toy to aid masturbation, Fleshlights are perfect for pleasuring you with a realistic feel for monstrous orgasms.What are Fleshlights? The Fleshlight is the world's biggest-selling male masturbation toy ever. Why?
Because they're the closest you'll get to the real thing from a male masturbator.Fleshlights are made from a soft, pliable, non-vibrating Real Feel Super Skin sleeve that has been specially designed to replicate the feel of a woman's vagina and the sensation of penetrative sex.Quite simply, Fleshlights are the closest you'll get to 'doing it' without actually doing it!How do Fleshlights work? Using a Fleshlight couldn't be simpler. All you need to do is remove the gel insert from the Fleshlight's plastic case and submerge it in hot - not boiling - tap water. Once the gel insert has warmed to your desired temperature, shake off the excess water and place the gel insert back in the Fleshlight's plastic case.With your new toy ready to rock, add some lubricant to your penis, the orifice entry of the Fleshlight and the internal canal of the gel insert. Then gently insert your penis and thrust away as you would during normal penetrative sex.When it comes to choosing a lube to use with Fleshlights, water-based lubricants such as Sliquid Ride H20 Lubricant, Tracey Cox Supersex Love Lube or ID Glide Lube work best.Some like to leave the Fleshlight's small end cap on during use to create suction on the backstroke, while others use their hands to restrict airflow at the bottom of the Fleshlight for a more intense sensation. Whatever floats your boat, you won't be disappointed with your Fleshlight's performance.Fleshlights and your Sex LifeIf you're not convinced that the sensation you get from using a Fleshlight is much better than jacking off to an old porn tape while using your rough mitts, then how about the .
will be told what I was told: an appointment at an anti-choicer-approved FQHC might be available in May if I called back in three weeks—at a location two cities away and five miles from the closest bus stop.
Or women can call Planned Parenthood, like I did, at lunch time on a Friday, and be told that an afternoon appointment including a full pelvic and breast exam is available that same day for about $100 at a location a few yards from a major public transportation hub that I could easily reach in a half-hour or so. But I’m getting ahead of myself. You see, I first had to do a little divination to figure out where exactly anti-choicers wanted me to get my health care (besides not Planned Parenthood), since I couldn’t actually get any of them to pass along that list of their approved providers to me. First thing in the morning, the day after I met with Rep. Dan Flynn, I called and e-mailed his office. After a day or so, they got back to me and advised I contact the anti-choice religious groupTexas Alliance For Life for a list of alternatives to Planned Parenthood. I e-mailed the Alliance on March 10:
So, what’s today? April the something? I haven’t heard back from the Alliance yet. I’ve even been Tweeting at both the Alliance and Rep. Flynn asking for that list of providers that can they believe can give me the same or better care as Planned Parenthood.
I know Flynn and his conservative counterparts were very busy over the weekend deciding which Texans deserve health care (hint: it’s not women of reproductive age) but I hoped that at least in Flynn’s passion for defunding family planning, he’d develop a passion for helping women find health care providers he approved of. I was wrong about that one.
I posted about my travails on my personal blog, where I have a number of anti-choice trolls who are always more than happy to share their wealth of knowledge with me. There, someone from another anti-choice group eventually commented and told me they wouldn’t mind if I went to a Federally Qualified Health Center or “look-alike” center that offers sliding fee scales. And look, said the pro-life Texan, there are seven such centers in Dallas! So that’s what I did: Last Friday morning, I went out of my way to find a doctor based on the fact that some people have a personal dislike of Planned Parenthood for providing abortionsa safe, common and legal medical procedure.
It hardly felt like easy-access, low-cost health care. It felt more like coercion, and it was a hassle, and it forced me to make decisions about my own body and health care based on what other people—people who never met me, who are not medical professionals—think I should be doing based on their religious beliefs.
I found that list of FQHC’s—I am privileged to have a flexible work schedule, home phone and home internet access, so I didn’t have to take time off work to go to the public library and use a pay phone, and I didn’t have to sneak around on a conservative, religious or abusive family or partnerand started making calls. Most places I telephoned did not provide reproductive health care and instead focused on providing low-income housing, job training and addiction-recovery programs. A homeless shelter on the FQHC list did tell me I could get a free pap smear if I could prove I was homeless. I then got sidetracked looking into something called Project Access, a low-cost program that helps uninsured people who don’t qualify for Medicaid—but because I made more than about $20,000 last year as an unmarried woman without kids, I don’t qualify for that, either.
And the Texas Breast And Cervical Cancer Services, which is supposed to provide low-cost screenings for Texas women? It referred me to Planned Parenthood. So that was a no-go.
Back to the phones: a clinic close-ish to my home had no receptionist and a full voicemail. Another receptionist laughed at me because I’d been given the number for the county hospital front desk and told me to call a place called Los Barrios Unidos Community Clinic. When I called Los Barrios, .
vaccination script using language they typically use to introduce the HPV vaccine to parents.
Immigrants, especially those from Latin America, viewed the vaccination more positively because they had experience with vaccine-preventable diseases and cervical cancer in their home countries. While providers did not note any difference in the sexual behaviors of adolescents from families of different ethnic backgrounds or incomes, they found that immigrant parents had more realistic impressions of their daughters' sexual activity than White middle-class parents.
The findings of this study may be applicable to larger disparities seen nationwide in HPV vaccination rates. Funding for this study was provided by an American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar Grant MRSG- .